Some Principles Of Fungicide Resistance III: Factors That Enhance Risk
LEXINGTON, KY.
This is the third in a series of articles
on fungicide resistance.
In the previous installment
of this series, I covered how
higher disease pressure
can result in higher risk of
fungicide resistance. Higher
disease pressure can come at
you from several directions, including:
• Disease-favorable weather conditions;
• Agronomic management; and,
• Characteristics of fungal pathogens themselves.
Disease-Favorable Weather
Many fungal diseases are favored by moisture.
In contrast, some diseases are more aggressive
under drier conditions. Whatever the weather
conditions that favor a particular disease, those
conditions also increase the risk of fungicide resistance.
See Figures 1-2 for a reminder of how
increased fungal activity results in increased
risk of fungicide resistance.
Agronomic Management
Virtually every agronomic practice potentially
can have an impact on development of one disease
or another. The most common agronomic
factors that affect disease development include:
site selection, previous crop; variety selection;
planting date; tillage program; and fertility.
Other factors can include row orientation, seeding
depth, harvest practices, seed treatment,
compaction management, etc., etc., etc. So we
have seen before, anything that increases disease
pressure increases the risk of fungicide resistance.
Characteristics of the Fungus
Some fungi pose a greater risk than others for
the development of resistance. Here are some
examples of pathogen characteristics that can
influence resistance buildup:
• Some fungi, such as rusts, powdery mildews,
downy mildews and leaf spots and blights, produce
spores in multiple cycles during the growing
season. These are called polycyclic (“many
cycles)”. Others, like Fusarium head blight of
wheat and the many smut diseases, only have
one infection cycle per season (monocyclic).
Polycyclic pathogens have an advantage, because
if a resistant spore occurs in a field, it can
buildup much more rapidly than can a monocyclic
pathogen, because it may produce a new
generation of spores as quickly as every week or
two.
• Fungicide resistance in airborne fungi poses
a greater threat than in soilborne fungi. The reason
is that fungal spores that disperse with air
movement (Figure 3) can sometimes move very
long distances: from field to field, across the
county, or even among states. A resistant fungal
colony that develops in a soilborne fungus tends
to move around much more slowly. It may only
move a few feet per year, as it is commonly
moved around by implements that work the
soil. Of course, soilborne spores may move further,
maybe from one farm to the next on tractors
and on fertilizer spreaders. However, spores
in the soil only move as far as the soil itself is
moved. In contrast, airborne fungi can travel
very long distances.
• Some fungi seem to have a strong genetic
tendency to adapt quickly to fungicides. Botrytis
cinerea, the cause of gray mold in many different
plants, is a notorious example. In this
fungus, resistance to several fungicide groups
(=FRAC Codes) is common in many locations
throughout the USA. Controlling gray mold with
fungicides is a perennial challenge for many
producers, because of resistance problems.
Some species of Cercospora fungi are also
highly adaptable genetically. For example, resistance
to QoI fungicides in the frogeye leaf
spot pathogen of soybean occurs in numerous
locations in Kentucky and the region. However,
not all fungi are so genetically adaptable. For
example, there is preliminary evidence that the
Cercospora that causes gray leaf spot of corn
may not adapt so easily to QoI fungicides. Plus,
mutation rates may vary from one fungus to the
next. Thus, each fungus has its own unique genetic
capability to generate fungicide-resistant
strains. Some are better at it than others.
Bottom line
Numerous factors increase the risk of fungicide
resistance. Some of these, like agronomic
factors, are under our control. Others – like the
weather and the genetic characteristics of the
fungus – are outside the range of human control.
As was emphasized in last week’s article,
wise use of fungicides continues to be a cornerstone
for reducing the risk of fungicide resistance.
Δ
DR. PAUL VINCELLI: Extension Professor and
Provost’s Distinguished Service Professor, University
of Kentucky
Figure 1. Initial step in fungicide resistance development: Occurrence
spores with resistance to the fungicide (filled circles).
Note that there are two resistant spores in this imaginary
crop field.
Figure 2. Imagine that this a second crop field, with lower disease
pressure. Consequently, the population of infectious spores is
about half that of Figure 1. Even though the mutation rate is the
same in both fields, only one mutant spore with resistance has occurred,
instead of the two mutants that emerged in Field 1.
Figure 3. Chains of spores of a powdery mildew fungus growing
above a leaf surface. These spores are easily broken off and dispersed
by air movement. From E.C. Large, 1940, Advance of the
Fungi, Holt & Company.